
Desperate to save his failing business, a husband borrows money from a friend, only for the friend to demand the wife as 'collateral' in lieu of interest. Thinking it's just domestic help, the wife finds herself trapped in a nightmare. The friend, a known deviant, uses the debt as leverage to exploit her body daily. What starts as coercion soon turns into a depraved addiction, as the once-chaste wife finds herself completely broken and hopelessly hooked on her husband's friend.




















Hanasaki-san is beautiful with an amazing figure. The premise of her having to satisfy her friend's sexual urges in exchange for a loan is great. I liked how she resisted at first but eventually gave in. The opening scene where she gets taken was definitely the highlight.
Peeling the pantyhose down to her thighs and keeping the skirt bunched up there. She's unable to move or resist while being taken from behind with an internal finish. The semen dripping onto the floor adds a certain melancholy that I really like.
Hanasaki Aian, with her stunning beauty and explosive sex appeal, is a masterpiece as she obediently lets her husband's friend bring her to climax over and over. She even ends up performing fellatio on her husband's friend's friend. It's a standard pattern, but because it's Hanasaki Aian, it's an absolute blast!
Watching her get corrupted in such a pleasurable way by her friend's sleazy torment was erotic. However, I would have loved it even more if there was another stage of corruption, or if the final scene had a more over-the-top climax of pleasure.
Since she's a beautiful actress, I wanted to see the process of her slowly taking off her clothes. However, not having her fully naked by the end is unacceptable. It's such a waste since she's so pretty. Also, it would be even better if they focused more intensely on her beautiful breasts and nipples during the sex scenes. Furthermore, it doesn't really live up to the title 'Training a Carnal Pet,' which is disappointing. Please, train her more thoroughly. Therefore, I'm deducting points and giving it a 3, though it's very close to a 4.