CESD-750 - Kimo-i kannou shousetsuka ni pet shigan suru chiku-bi no kirei na onna henshuusha 4 Misaki Azusa

Azusa-chan is great, but I physically cannot stand this male actor. It might sound strange coming from a man, but the 'slurping/squelching' sounds this actor makes are just unbearable. It gives me goosebumps and makes me want to turn it off. I don't know if it was the director's instruction or if the sound engineer emphasized it, but I think raw audio should blend naturally into the work and the visuals. Conversely, I'd really like to know how many people actually find pleasure in these kinds of 'sounds'. It's not his looks, but his sounds that I hate; I've reached the point where I stop watching the moment he appears.

1. First off, the intro recap is unnecessary! It kills the mood right when things are getting good. The bathroom masturbation scene was fine, but taking the manuscript with her? They could've just used narration for the content. If the novelist had just told her to 'check the manuscript' before leaving, it would've transitioned naturally. Still, the scene itself was good. 2. The creepy one is the apprentice, not the novelist, right? It would've been better if the apprentice was a woman—maybe a former editor who got trained. (Who even is that guy? Total turn-off!) 3. The vibe panties were fine, but the loud slurping on the dildo is too professional! It ruins the 'newbie editor' vibe. Why do they make so much noise these days? It's not erotic at all. Also, her pubic hair is completely groomed; I personally find a light trim much sexier. The blowjob while using the dildo was good, though. 4. The bath scene is a problem. Does anyone bathe or shower with their underwear on? Did a soapland worker show up? And it's too long. Loud slurping (and they don't even shower or bathe? You'll catch a cold, cut this scene, idiots). Use that time for other training scenes instead. 5. Next, they brought out a brush, but Misaki Azusa was already lying there naked. Unless it's some unique brush-lotion play, it's pointless. 6. What happened to the 'creepy erotic novelist' angle? It's too light, no ropes or restraints, which is a shame. Such a waste of a good actress. * Too many AVs these days think just 'doing it' is enough. (Just swapping actresses with the same script, how easy for you.) Is the director, writer, and producer all the same person? Put some effort into it.

*Azusa has a beautiful face that looks great with makeup. The fat from the belly down is just right. Although she has only recently made her debut, she is a highly accomplished actress. She can almost always drool with her tongue out, and the way she moves her hips is like that of a barefoot expert. The main ejaculation is only the first one, but the resistance to eroticism is low, and it is a work where you can see the real orgasm and small convulsions to the fullest.

Misaki Azusa, playing a female editor, is set up to get aroused by the lewd passages of an erotic novel, but in reality, she absolutely loves being stimulated by toys and getting tangled up with a cock. Plus, she's quite cute and has a wonderful body with beautiful breasts; seeing someone like her act so depraved is a dream come true for any man. During fellatio, she even licks the anus without hesitation, and of course, raw sex and creampies are all on the table. Isn't Misaki Azusa the perfect protagonist for an erotic novel? Whether she's receiving or taking charge, she's a turn-on... I'm sure there are plenty of AV users out there getting a hard-on while writing these reviews.