Cast Info Pending
club00412
*The situations are the same in all the works, but since they involve wearing clothes, I bought it based on the actress' body shape, the clothes she's wearing, and the expression on her face when she's in agony. In this work, some actresses wore flashy lingerie. . . There was no actress who thought this way. If you're going to buy it, I think it's better to look at samples of other works before considering it.
Even if the general plot is the same, I liked the subtle differences in direction in this one. The casting was top-notch, and I thought the dialogue and acting felt very natural. Personally, I liked the second actress, but the third one was also good with a slightly different approach than usual.
Sayaka Narumi, Emily Moroboshi (formerly Emi Hoshii), and Nao Mizuki. All three have beautiful, large breasts and could easily carry a solo feature, so why are they cast in a nameless compilation? ( ｉ _ ｉ ) On top of that, the skinny, big-dicked male actor talks way too much, which is annoying. These are top-tier actresses, yet it's all fixed-camera shots with no close-ups. Even when the angle changes, they're too far away; you can see the whole picture, but the important parts are too distant to be exciting. The positions are just standard missionary, doggy, and cowgirl shot with a static camera—it's not interesting at all. The stars are only because I love these three actresses.
1st: Sayaka Narumi, 2nd: Emily Moroboshi, 3rd: Nao Mizuki. Like the previous entries, only the final segment with Nao Mizuki was slightly different. The woman confesses to having bullied the guy, then receives a call from the person she just had sex with, realizing they are friends. She's confident in her oral skills and tries to make him finish, but eventually, she can't hold back, inserts herself, and makes him finish. It was great that all the actresses had beautiful, large breasts this time. The issue is that while they use oil, they apply so little, and the orange-tinted lighting makes it barely noticeable. If you're going to use oil, brighten the lights and use plenty of it. Also, since it's a long-take style, the pacing varies, but each person gets about 20-25 minutes of foreplay and intercourse. With a 4-hour runtime for 3 people, that means about an hour of massage per person. That's way too long. It would be fine if there were variety, but having the same dialogue and content for an hour is unnecessary. If there were twists—like the guy being unable to hold back and getting blindfolded, or seeing a call from a previous partner—I'd watch every time. But with the same content, it gets stale. The timing of the reveal (during oral, right after insertion, etc.) and the dramatic shifts (blindfolding him the moment she sees his size, then revealing the past) feel forced. There's no real need to bring up the bullying backstory unless it involves specific acts like face-sitting. If you can't add variety, cut the massage scenes and add a fourth person to make it a 4-person, 4-hour feature.
