
Exclusive contract! J-cup beauty Nanami Matsumoto joins the stable. A naive country boy stays at his uncle's house in Tokyo. While his aunt, Nanami, helps him study, her stunning body and luxury lingerie leave him breathless. Then she leans in and whispers, "Was last night... too stimulating?" As their lips touch, studying is the last thing on his mind.




















*Actress: Nanami Matsumoto It's great to see all kinds of erotic underwear. I especially like the first black underwear.
All the guys named Sho-chan across the country must be so happy to be called like that by Nanami. I'm so jealous, lol. Definitely a keeper.
Nanami Matsumoto is fine, but the content was worse than Series 1. I wish they had utilized Nanami Matsumoto's appeal more, like with pussy and boobs!
She's got great boobs and does a really intense job, plus she's good with her tongue – definitely one of my favorites. But what's with the glasses? They might be okay for people who are into that, but as a Matsumoto fan, I'm not a fan at all. It actually kinda kills the mood. There were like 2 or 3 scenes with glasses, which was a waste.
This is a work where the evaluation differs depending on the viewer's perspective on what they expect from the work. Those who care about the quality of the 'drama' as a drama AV tend to rate it lower, while those who don't care rate it higher. The play itself is good, showcasing the charm of Nanami Matsumoto, but it stops at the fun of the play alone and isn't amazing enough to praise highly. Well, it was the content I expected, considering the director's technical issues. This director is good at shooting, but their weakness is that they can't focus on necessity. First, in terms of the drama's quality, the initial flow doesn't naturally resolve the awkwardness and discomfort. Even a single line of dialogue feels unnatural. The intent and expression are appropriate, but the timing is off. This builds up, and while you can see they're trying to create a dramatic feel early on, it lacks momentum. Therefore, the fun of the drama doesn't build on the fun of the play, and the play only has its own isolated fun. Furthermore, the play's direction isn't appropriate, so it doesn't reach a level of unrestrained enjoyment. The concept of the work should be to show the virtuousness of a housewife in the drama, then show her lewdness, and make the gap the source of fun. However, because the virtuousness isn't portrayed well, the fun doesn't build when the lewdness is revealed. This gap moe direction is lacking, and the awkwardness of each scene further diminishes the fun. Even the initial encounter, the way the shirt buttons are undone is too unnatural, making her feel like just a lewd woman at that point. She carefully took off the stockings, but ending with a suggestive push-in without taking off the panties lowers the fun. The unnaturalness of wearing underwear during the bathroom encounter lowers the fun. During the living room encounter, tearing the stockings during masturbation clashes with the action from the initial encounter, and the awkwardness and suggestive push-in lower the fun. If they can portray a scene of having sex with underwear on during the final encounter, they could have used that direction in the previous encounters as well. The necessity of taking off the stockings, the necessity of the suggestive push-in, the necessity of entering the bathroom with underwear on, the necessity of tearing the stockings… Because these necessities aren't portrayed, it becomes unnatural and doesn't translate into fun. That's what this director can't do. If they could just master this direction, they'd be a great director…