FSET-263 - Caught in the Act: Silent Thrills in Public

The camerawork is a bit lacking, but the first and second actresses are hot enough to get the job done.

The sex with the blonde white girl in a yellow plaid skirt and knee-socks at an izakaya is hard to see, even with the side-pushed panty penetration, due to the camerawork and dim lighting. Such a waste. She's wearing a light blue thong, but they should have zoomed in on the point of penetration to really capture the texture and sheen of the fabric. The forced 'hidden camera' setup with a static shot really kills the excitement.

*All four actresses are beautiful and cute, and the situation is not bad (even if you think you'll find out, it's an AV, so let's close our eyes) However, everything else is no good. The camera angles everyone is reviewing are from far away or from strange places, making it difficult to get into the situation. The surrounding noise is too loud. It also makes no sense to put a mosaic on the actor's face. The name of the actress is not amateurish, and you can tell who she is even from the mosaic, so it was just a nuisance.

I completely agree with the other reviews. I don't know if they were trying for a 'hidden camera' vibe, but the angles are bad, the camera is too far away, and the footage is so dark that I couldn't get into it at all. Even when filming from directly above, you can't tell what's going on. I rented this for Chloe Fujisaki, but in her scenes, it was so dark that I couldn't see what was happening or even see her expressions. It was terrible. I don't understand why the ratings are so high.

It's underwhelming because all the shots are from a distance. Why not bring the camera in closer? Just treat it like a TV drama and pretend the camera isn't there. If they did that, they could include plenty of immersive close-ups that make it feel like you're right there in the room. The cast is great and the intro was promising, which makes the lack of intimacy in the actual scenes even more disappointing.