
Shota's father hires a strict maid to take care of Shota's bad attitude towards life. However, Shota gets very excited when he sees the busty maid 'Ruri'! He plots to touch Ruri's huge breasts, rubs her breasts in the name of shoulder rubs, takes a bath with her, makes her titty fuck him, and finally has sex with her...




















Honestly, I think this type of work is very polarizing. If you like it, then go for it—that's all I can say. I bought it because I'm a fan of 'Ruri Saijo,' but I felt that watching it once was enough. It's not just this one, but her works often have visible tan lines here and there. It might be a bit late to say this, but I wish she had shown a bit more professionalism.
That's way too stimulating for a kid! Ruri-nee-san moaning and trying to stay quiet while her massive breasts are being groped from behind... Seeing her in an M-spread on the kitchen counter while getting licked was pretty good, but the kid's pranks are too monotonous! He should be using toys that would actually embarrass her, like a kid would... He needs to tease her until she can't hold back her moans, that's what gets us viewers excited! Well, her oral technique while licking the kid's dick was impressive, though. Also, I don't think a kid would know how to do a belly-exposure technique... If the partner is a kid, the standard should be oral ejaculation for the top, and internal ejaculation for the bottom, right?
It's a common occurrence in the 'Big Boob' series, but the creampie scene mentioned on the package isn't actually there. The first round is just breast exposure on the bed, and the second is the same in the kitchen. Only two rounds, and no creampie. Well, it's not like I'm surprised at this point.
The content is decent enough, but this actress isn't my type, so I'm just not feeling it. The shota element is what it is, and since this series lives or dies by the actress, it's a miss for me.
*The prank makes her feel good and she allows him to ``cum''...which scene is this? Such a scene does not exist. There's no need to do it unless there's a specific scene, but it's clearly written on the package, right? Why did I write it down... Other than that point, I was personally satisfied with the content, so I was really shocked by the ``falsified display''. It's a shame.