HND-140 - Monthly FWB: My Convenient Sex Buddy Aoi Shirasaki

It's just one scene after another. Half of it is a static camera, and the other half is poorly shot POV. It's disappointing because it doesn't really utilize Aoi Shirasaki's potential; anyone could have done this.

They tried to put some effort into it, but it all feels like a third-rate drama. The actress's looks and acting are fine, but the production is just lazy.

She has a classy vibe and doesn't feel cheap, which is nice. She has an aura similar to the members of Perfume. The first half is mostly just a single fixed camera from a distance with a lot of talking, but during the sex scenes, they use a handheld camera and picture-in-picture, which makes up for it. The middle part also uses POV/self-filming, which is decent. The post-ejaculation leakage is a nice touch. The second half features a 3P with consecutive internal ejaculations.

*What if it was really a sex friend with a real sex friend? This abnormally far fixed point camera is also possible, but it can't be like that. This is a common pre-made AV, so you can understand the harsh reviews. However, the raw sex seems to be serious and there is no cut before insertion. It's good to just go with the flow and have sex. I guess he's on the pill. Aoi Shirasaki has a tattoo that was erased on her left ring finger. It makes me imagine that there are various reasons why she appears in AV. She's an interesting actress. She has a cute smile and I get the feeling that she'll let me do it right away (though I don't know if she actually does). The lovey-dovey SEX in s-cute works is the most recommended.

I watched this with high expectations because it was Shirasaki Aoi's 'no-condom' debut, but the people who made this must be idiots. First of all, out of a 120-minute runtime, the first 20 minutes—a full sixth of the movie—is just a fixed camera shot of the actors chatting while fully clothed. Are you kidding me? At 35 minutes, they finally get to the insertion, but guess what? It's just a fixed camera shot from far away. These people are amateurs. When filming sex, the crew needs to get right into the bed and film it as if they're part of the action, otherwise, it just feels cold and detached. A fixed camera? Unbelievable. The second scene looked like it might be POV, but they relied on a fixed camera again. The third scene was just sloppy. And the whole thing is dark; I guess they didn't think about lighting at all. The actress is doing her best, even spreading herself and begging for it raw. But it's such a waste of her performance. Spend some money and hire a decent crew.