
Two active college students living in a share house with various men. A raw, unscripted documentary of a creampie competition between the girls.










*There seem to be some harsh reviews about the actresses, but in my opinion they were the best because they were cute and gave off the "realistic female college student vibe." โTo two inexperienced AV actresses, โLet them choose the other male actor, and the more disgusting or age-difference the male actor cums in, the higher the score will be given (they will also compete for the number of times)โ This game is played in a house over dinner. โ That idea is also great. I can't seem to find this type of work in recent books, but I would love to see the project revived. Even with the various contracts between actresses, agencies, and manufacturers these days, there is no hard play, so I think it would be possible if they allowed the actress to choose the actor with true free will. However, what really detracted from this work was that the meaningless "hidden rules" appeared many times (even the viewers didn't know what the "hidden rules" were), and there was a scene where the actress was repeatedly told things like "Actually, I can't choose the actor" and ended up crying in anger. I really don't know what the "hidden rules" were for. What is the meaning of hidden rules that even the viewers don't understand? It's a shame that "a real creampie game with real college girls" turned into an "unfair game." A game with rules. Viewers don't want meaningless rule breaking, and they don't want meaningless anger or tears from an actress. This work is not sold as a ``humiliation'', and judging from the package image, one would expect it to be about a ``healthy college girl actress playing games''. Actually, about half of the value of this work is blown away by the "hidden rules", so I would like to give it 2 or 3 stars, but... The two actresses and the idea/concept are great. I hope that the actress, the manufacturer, and the agency will make a contract that ``excludes hard-playing'' and ``respects the wishes of the actress and plays the game according to the rules'' before making the next work. This work features "two female college students," and I'd like to see a new version of "two female college students and new actresses," but I think it would be just as interesting to see, for example, "two office lady-style new actresses." I gave it 4 stars because of the ``idea'' and ``the meaning of looking forward to and supporting the next work.''
Maybe the actress just isn't into sex. It felt like she was just doing her job, which was a total turn-off.
'Creampie Sharehouse'... sounds great. That's exactly why I wish they had put more effort into the concept and story. There are 'creampie points,' but it feels half-baked. The girls aren't top-tier actresses, more like Satomi Ishida and Hinako Mizukawa (they did capture the college student vibe well?), but maybe that realistic level is fine? I'd say it's like Satomi Ishida for the face and Hinako Mizukawa for the sex.