
Cast Info Pending
In a salon in Tokyo, the therapist constantly shows her panties, claiming it's for blood circulation. Touching and extras are strictly prohibited. But what if you show off your hard-on, and she starts grinding her crotch over her panties against you? Maybe a secret session is in the cards?




















There are four episodes, but what's the point if they all go all the way? There wasn't a single panty shot. I wish they'd stop with the 'just finish it' mentality. If you have four episodes, at least two should just be about the foreplay/massage. If you do everything every time, it loses its value. A competent director understands that, but the incompetent ones just don't get it.
The concept, which brings fantasies to life, is excellent. The actress's vibe and the costume were perfect, really feeling like a professional aesthetician. However, the fetishism for lingerie is surprisingly weak. First, the camerawork. There are too many wide shots, and there's a lack of close-up, lingering shots on the panties. Since it's framed as an aesthetic salon, it's hard to get that sense of 'lucky' voyeurism or illicit thrill. Second, the sex scenes. If the aforementioned panty shots and the actress's expressions were captured well, the sex scenes themselves would be a plus. But the users seeking this content are likely panty or lingerie fetishists; in that case, it would have been better to keep the innocent, dainty underwear on and just slide it to the side for penetration. That said, the concept is so brilliant that I'm very curious about the next installment.
The first and third actresses are the type who look slim in clothes, but they had big breasts. Personally, I like the first one, but I don't know her name.
It has an AROMA-like vibe, but it's not actually AROMA, is it? Even though they go through the trouble of showing her panties, it just turns into a standard intercourse scene halfway through. I think a true fetish work should just keep showing the goods. The camera work also lacks shots from below or behind, so I'd like to see improvements there as well.