INDI-002 - I raped an amateur boy in the toilet and he thanked me!

No, it was actually pretty good! It's just that the number of ejaculations was too low. Despite Tachibana-san's comment at the beginning about forcing her to drink the squeezed-out semen, there wasn't enough ejaculation, so it felt lacking. I wonder if this director isn't making films anymore… It would be great if they made a new one…

If you're watching this as an AV, you're losing out. Even as a variety show, the camerawork is so terrible that it's just not good. The actress is great, though.

I've seen many of this director's works and knew the reviews from dominant men were poor. To be blunt, if you're a dominant guy, don't watch this. The handheld and static angles are bad, and the production value is amateurish... but who cares! The opening doggy-style scene is amazing! The director's unnecessary commentary in the subtitles is annoying, but since it's a female director, I let it slide. I really understood why dominant male directors get bad reviews elsewhere. To all the masochists: ignore the self-proclaimed 'doms' who can't drop their pride! This is a real reverse-rape masterpiece. Of course, since all women are naturally dominant, I actually recommend this to women too. Oh, and some people say Hinata over Hibiki—I get it, but you can't leave out Hibiki-sama.

This is my first time watching this director's work, and I already knew they were infamous for bad reviews. To put it simply, men should probably skip this. The handheld and static camera angles are poor, and the production value is amateurish. The director's unnecessary commentary appearing in the subtitles is just distracting. I truly understand why this director is so poorly rated in other works.

*This applies to all of this director's works, but he often shows off his ugly face and makes me feel weak. He also has a bad mouth. It's just a hindrance to the actress. You can tell by the fact that she's ugly and proudly appears in the center of the picture.