IPX-982 - Stepmom's sister and brother-in-law's secret affair under the long skirt

A long skirt feels pretty unnatural for a secret home-sex scenario. You can't really see the action well.

I bought this because it was a long-skirt theme with Tsubasa Amami. The beginning was okay, but in the desk scene, the chair in the foreground seems to get in the way, so the camera never gets close enough to see her chest or the inside of the long skirt mentioned in the title. They should have reshot that... I get they wanted to emphasize the 'doing it while the husband works nearby' scenario, but the constant high-angle shots mean you can't see what you want to see. It cuts away as soon as the act starts... I know that's common, but is it too much to ask to see the finish? The sofa scene in front of the husband was good because you could see inside the skirt, but that was short-lived; the husband disappears, and it turns into a random full-nude bed scene. Why market the outfit if you're just going to strip her immediately? The last scene isn't even a long skirt anymore, and the camerawork is so bad it's pointless. Tsubasa Amami's acting was good, so I'll avoid giving it the lowest rating, but it was a confusing production. If you're going to bait us with a specific fetish, stick to it until the end.

A husband's younger brother being an ex-boyfriend—that's a relationship you don't see every day. And having sex right in front of him is so unique. Plus, getting pregnant by the ex! However, the scene inside the long skirt only happened once; it's a shame the content didn't quite live up to the title.

*The content is obscene and tantalizing. Tsubasa Amami's temptations are real and erotic. I want to see it in other places, so please make it into a series!

*Tsubasa-san seems to have become more and more colorful lately. This time, my old boyfriend was my married husband's younger brother. At first, my ex-boyfriend pressured me, but then things started to ignite. Putting aside the story, it's related, but to be clear, if you look at it from the perspective of insertion and removal, The camera angle is not good. In the first instance, it was inside a long skirt, so it can't be helped that it didn't look good. However, the camera angles are not good from the second time onwards. There are only monotonous angles projected from a fixed range, and no effort is made to find good angles. Even if you get close to a good angle, it stops just before you reach it, which is a level of harassment. Furthermore, the second time, during the entanglement, the big brother intruded twice, and the entanglement stopped each time, which was a big point deduction. What does this director want to film, even though it's an AV?