JUFD-667 - 24/7 Non-stop Sex! Living Together with Tsubasa Hinagiku

*Tsubasa's work from a time when she was still more ugly than cute. Although the texture is still a long way off, the outstanding fleshiness and sensitivity remain the same. I am still impressed by the regular cleaning habits that I have developed.

*It is true that other people have written it, but it may not be subjective, I think that tastes differ.

I'm a fan of Tsubasa Hinagiku, and personally, I can't get enough of that unpolished look on her face, like she's still a bit nervous about sex. Especially in the drive date scene, that expression when she resists at first but then gets pushed over and has to give in... it's just perfect.

*The third AV debut of G-cup college girl Tsubasa Hinagiku. The story begins with Miss Tsubasa and the protagonist (user)'s first day together. She rolls into the protagonist's home apartment with a large amount of luggage. After eating ``mochi soba'' with friends, we immediately ``enjoy'' it on the bed. The next morning, Tsubasa's morning sex and titty fuck gives me a lot of ejaculation in my mouth. The experience of having a topless big-breasted college girl give you a blowjob in the morning is truly a blissful moment. After having sex in a "naked apron" with outstanding destructive power, she served fellatio on a drive date. The two fight over the seasoning for dinner, but they quickly make up after taking a bath together. Miss Tsubasa, who comes to be pampered like a kitten naked in the narrow bathtub, can be described as ``cuteness far beyond human imagination.'' Needless to say, the two were excited and had sex on the bed. Anyway, Tsubasa Hinagiku looks cute. Her breasts are erotic. It comes down to those two things.

*Emotionally, I give it zero stars. I feel sorry for the actress Hinagiku, but this is the worst subjective work I've seen recently. Well, it's not even subjective in the first place. The packaging says it's "completely subjective," but except for the tit-fuck chapter, all the main interactions are "gonzo." The disadvantages of gonzo photography, such as camera shake, out-of-focus, and noise, hinder it, and naturally there is no subjective sense of realism or immersion. Furthermore, there are scenes where the man only uses one hand (or can't), the camera is fixed to his side, and the actress is facing the actor rather than the camera. Can this still be considered subjective? In the end, the actor is nothing but a silent gonzo. Although the subtitles include a man's voice to give it a more subjective feel, this is not the point where you should put in the effort if you want to capture the subjectivity. Most of the time I'm wrong. The idea of ​​filming a POV film using gonzo is probably a thoughtless idea from someone who has no interest in subjectivity at all. This director and staff completely lack the ``viewer's perspective'' of what the viewers are looking for. To put it bluntly, I am disqualified as a professional. Also, I'm suspicious of manufacturers who sell products based on this subjectivity. For those who want to see Gonzo, please visit. However, as mentioned earlier, the actors do not speak, so the ``private feeling between men and women'' that is the flavor of Gonzo is diminished, but if that's okay.