MISM-044 - 30-year-old busty housewife with 3-year sexless marriage makes her AV debut

*Although there are many harsh reviews, I personally enjoyed it. You can clearly see the actress' curiosity about sex in the opening interview. This interaction must be real. The gesture of touching her hair is also innocent. However, I wonder if the reason she's not wearing stockings at this point is because she took a shower beforehand. It's tempting to look at her well-shaped bust. He says that he is aware of M and also has a desire to be tied down. It reminded me of a plain office worker at a company I had a relationship with a long time ago. She hugged me crying and begging me to make a mess of her. The scene in the middle where he dies with a steel dildo is impressive. After all, there may be many women who are more likely to die from hard materials. Let's try it next time. The finale is a circle play between the three, but I would have liked to see a little more obscene language exchanged. I wonder if this actress has a tendency to squirt despite her young age. From about 1:49:01 onwards, the actor yells, "I'm going to come out," and when the actor pulls out his penis, he squirts silently and loudly. It was very interesting.

Full-head masks of this type absolutely should not have eye holes. You need to understand the significance of a mask that only has a mouth hole. Beyond just the look, the point of a mouth-only mask is to 'block the woman's vision and signify that her head is only useful for oral,' which is to say, it embodies the humiliation of being a 'tool for male-centric sexual gratification'—that's exactly why it's hot. I don't understand why anyone would choose a mask with eye holes, and I don't think there's any good reason for it. If they were trying to be greedy and show her face too, it's the worst possible choice that fails at both. You'd be better off not wearing a mask at all. I'll say it again: you don't need to see the actress's face with a full-head mask. It should be 'all or nothing'—either a mouth-hole mask or no mask at all. If a director is too indecisive to make that call, they shouldn't be using full-head masks. Also, if you're going to do spanking, do it properly. If it's obvious you're going easy on the actress, you're better off not doing it at all. Why would you put footage of the 'aggressor' coddling the actress into the final cut? It's half-baked in every way.

It's cheap, Caribbean-style video site quality, and with the mosaic, it feels like a total rip-off, like Groupon holiday food. It's so obviously a hack job, stitching together similar scenes that I suspect it was made for that purpose. The awkward, amateurish interview at the start shows how desperate and unskilled the production team is, which killed my mood immediately. As expected, it's a flop. You've got a scrawny guy doing weak, hesitant spanking and irrumatio, editing that's basically teleportation, and 'fake' hardcore stuff like fade-in/out bondage (with cotton rope, obviously), nipple clamps, and a fixed vibrator. It claims one-on-one and a 4P, but it's likely just 'morning banana' style quickies to save time and money—the pay probably reflects that. They've dropped the whole 'former ballerina' marketing, so maybe management or the user feedback forced her to wear a mask the whole time. She seems like she'd be into anal, so reset the character and next time, give us a real hardcore gangbang with some Kansai yakuza or tough guys. By the way, I'm pretty sure the actress is Nao Hamasaki. She's on the 'ugly' side, but personally, I wish she hadn't worn the mask.