MUCD-170 - Perfect Uniform Fit! 14 Pure Beauties Collection: Exciting Clothed Play

I like that there's no unnecessary story, but it's a bit too repetitive. It felt like they were reusing the same lingerie (though I think the style choices fit the setting). I like that the camera crew stays completely out of sight. Some tripods and monitors were visible, but I like that it's mostly just the girls. I don't need multiple men or extreme close-ups of faces, so it's very immersive in that regard. It would have been perfect if they had more variety in the play, more intensity, or changed up the locations and environments.

This isn't one of those AVs where an idol-level beauty appears and follows a script. It's just a cute girl you might find in your class, in a very ordinary house, having no conversation and just doing it in simple, unchanging positions. But... if you think of it as 'that kind of thing' (home sex with a girlfriend you're already used to), it's actually pretty good. The positions don't change too often, which is nice, and the framing is conscious of showing the important parts clearly. The male actor (is he the director/cameraman?) stays completely in the background. There are nice touches, like a school bag casually left in the frame. If they had included scenes of her entering the room or showering afterward—even just for each person—the 'at home with my girlfriend' vibe would have been even stronger. (Maybe it was in the unedited version?)

*Ryoko: Her face is all clenched and her eyes are closed. Facial cumshot. It's good to be so shy. Creampie. It's okay to be shy. The balls are good. Creampie. Maya: It's good to be shy. Creampie. Konomi reacted indifferently, like she didn't like it, but her reaction changed several times along the way, which is a matter of personal preference. There is no confirmation of ejaculation (creampie?). Akina: Extra points for her plump legs that aren't too thick. There is a core to his acting that makes you feel good and smile. Creampie. Hikaru's dedicated blowjob gets extra points. Facial cumshot. Yuka: Extra points for thoroughly looking at the camera. Facial cumshot. Mayu small breasts. Infant body type. Extra points for looking at the camera. Facial cumshot. Aina: It's better to be shy. The shape of the buttocks is also good when standing and back. Facial cumshot. Mikoto Big breasts (possibly H). Ball butt. Whether or not you consider an occasional smile to be inconsistent depends on the person. Although she has big breasts, there is no titjob. Facial cumshot. From Wakaba Onoue "A beautiful girl in uniform with a small body and a sensitive G cup". Creampie. From Kokoa Aisu's ``Ako, a 143cm beautiful girl in uniform who wants to be hugged.'' Facial cumshot. Nanase: The way he handles his cock is like a potato. Facial cumshot. Creampie...5/14. For some reason, only two works had "work title display", and I was able to identify the actress's name from the work title. Other than that, 2 or 3 hiragana characters are displayed. I didn't even think to identify the actress's name, so I'll leave it to someone else to identify the actress. I don't know if it's because of the camera, the lighting, or the makeup, but my face and body look dark or pale. Because of this, all the actresses look inferior. I don't know if this was an attempt to make her look like a ``potty, amateurish school girl,'' or if it was just a mistake. However, even if it's a performance, I don't think it's really necessary. Is it a matter of using a ``potato-like actress'', but a first-class actress? quality intentionally? Isn't it a waste to drop it and use it? Most actresses' looks are now ``just average''. I don't know about the original work, but the positions included in this work are limited. Almost 2 or 3 positions per person. Most of them are cowgirl position (or sitting facing each other) + missionary position, or some combination of doggy style. Elements that are not recommended for anyone other than those who like cowgirl and missionary positions. Also, I don't spend much time checking my ejaculation. Editing deductions. The quality of the actresses is ``not bad'' and points are added based on the cost performance of the number of people, but as mentioned above, there are many points that are deducted, so I gave it 3 stars.