
Cast Info Pending
I wanted to have sex with girls wearing bloomers, which are now rare, so I found a school that still wears them. Capturing a girl in bloomers, rubbing her dick against her bloomers, pushing her bloomers hard, moving her bloomers, etc. It's a sight to see how an undeveloped body becomes a prisoner of pleasure at the hands of a molester. Furthermore, in this work, even athlete Bulma, who is involved in club activities, becomes a victim of molestation.




















This is such a half-baked production. I don't think the track bloomers were necessary, and neither the actress nor the actors seem to have any motivation. Compared to the previous installment, the drop in quality is severe. This is true for Natural High productions in general, but compared to their older bloomer-themed works, the quality has really gone downhill.
A lot of effort clearly went into this production. It avoids the unnecessary shouting and verbal abuse common in group-rape scenarios, and the quiet, methodical approach to the assault isn't bad. However, it feels quite disconnected from the 'bloomer-clad high school girl' premise promised in the title. Itโs not bad, but I can't say it's good either.
I think theyโve got the wrong idea here. It feels way too forced. Iโm amazed they even made it to a second installment. This isn't even a proper bloomer fetish film. None of the actresses are cute, either. Itโs just a cheap production.
1st performer: Ai Naoshima She's quite cute. Her demure nature and the way she gives in without putting up much of a fightโthat innocence is great. However, she barely makes any noise, which makes it hard to get excited. Moving to the back seat area was a good choice. It kept the annoying male presence to a minimum, and the lack of other people ensured a spacious setting. But while standing, the camera only captured low angles, making it hard to see, and even when shooting straight on, it was all close-ups. You couldn't really tell what was going on, which completely ruined what could have been a good scene. It's baffling that despite having a wide space, they relied so much on close-ups and rarely showed her full body. Performers 2 and 3 have no actual sex scenes. Performers 4 and 5 do, but they're lackluster. The actresses aren't great, and the camerawork is frustrating. Overall, the material of the bloomers looks cheap and unrealistic. There are more 'sports-style' outfits than actual school-themed ones. There was also a foolish sequence where they dirtied and tore the bloomers. The fact that the top wasn't a gym uniform just shows the creators 'don't get it'.