
Cast Info Pending
Handjob under the skirt in a crowded train




















Isn't there an issue with how they chose the PIP (picture-in-picture) shots? Like, showing a close-up of her face while the PIP shows the penetration... They put the parts I wanted to see on the big screen into the tiny PIP window... There was a lot of room for improvement in this production. The actresses were amazing, though!! Thank you...
*It was a maniacal play that didn't require her to take her clothes off (although she did take off her panties), and for someone like me who doesn't like having her pants pulled up, it was great because it was a maniacal work in which he penetrated her through the zipper opening. What's really disappointing is that it's dark, as mentioned in other reviews, and most of all, I was disappointed in the mosaic, which was so dark and so wide that I couldn't see what was going on. Also, what's the point of wearing a mosaic when you're wearing panties even though they're wet? At worst, it's too dark.
Unable to withstand the persistent molestation, they soak their panties and leak fluids... <Content> 1st: Miyuki Arisaka - groped, forced sex โ cum on skirt. 2nd: Minori Kotani - same treatment โ creampie on a shaved pussy. 3rd: Yu Kiriyama - molested while sitting, leaking fluid โ intense doggy style at the door โ cum on skirt. 4th: Moe Hazuki - face-to-face, massive urination โ forced intercourse โ creampie. The actresses and direction are great, but as other reviews have noted, it's too dark inside the skirt to see anything. The whole point is the 'panties soaked in fluid,' but you can't even see it...
There are so many groping-themed works that just chase extreme content, but this one focuses on the actual 'act' of groping, which is a good approach. It's much better than just having sex on a train. However, that focus backfired in many ways. You can't really see inside the skirt, which is the most important part. It's dark, super zoomed-in, and covered in mosaics, so you have no idea what's happening. The frustration of being teased with something you can't see is real! I understand it's monotonous without flashy performances, but it's mostly just facial close-ups, skirt close-ups, and high-angle shotsโit needs more variety. Using a wipe for facial expressions is a good technique, but they should've split the screen or mixed in shots of her feet or full body. They really should've used a reflector or light for the skirt area. Bus-themed groping videos usually have bright low-angle shots, so maybe they should try that next time? It's a shame because everything is visible on the package art! Director Bacon, looking forward to your next one.
*The molestation progresses quietly, and although it is unwilling, I feel it in silence... I want to see this kind of pervert. It was beautifully done. just! One very disappointing thing is that the fourth sample scene (child in uniform with red skirt) is missing. I bought it because I wanted to see this scene the most... This is not limited to this manufacturer, but there is a pattern where a product is included in the sample, but when you buy it, the scene is not there... I really wish they would stop this. I don't understand why they didn't include it in the main story even though they actually filmed that scene and included it in the sample. What do you want? That's what it feels like. Well, that was a pretty big drawback, but the work itself was pretty good.