OOMN-164 - 59 Rounds of White Hot Load! Facial Cumshot Special

Less than amateur-level volume, sloppy interaction, missing the target at the end, or weirdly 'considerate' shots to the chin or cheek—there was even a fake ejaculation. This is a textbook example of how an AV is worthless if the finish isn't authentic. Once you spot a fake shot, you start doubting everything else, which kills the mood completely. What are they even thinking when they make these? I wish they'd make something that actually gets me excited.

*In conclusion, 85% of ejaculations are not thick or large amounts. Thin or small amount. How on earth should I collect them so that I can sell them with this title and the package photo? Did the people who gave it a high rating really look inside? This is the first time I've used the two words "fraud" in a review. Moreover, as I will explain later, it cannot be used as a ``sample'' or ``ordinary compilation'' for two reasons. When I saw about the third person, I thought to myself, ``...? Is this omnibus collection just a collection of facial cumshot scenes that aren't intense or voluminous?'' and I had a bad feeling about it. I checked all the ejaculation scenes to say it's a scam. As a result, (While grading is quite lenient) Facial ejaculation is done as per the image of Pakesha... 9 people (15%) If you look at it as a normal AV, the facial cumshot is acceptable, but it's not "rich" or "massive"...24 people (40%) "Huh? That's it?" facial cumshot...27 people (45%) Among them, “You got a cup.” No, not at all. There is one scene. There are 7 or 8 cases where even if you give a reasonable amount of information, you miss the mark. 6 cases where the fadeout after facial cumshot was clearly too fast. The most impressive one was one where the white skin and too bright lighting turned the face completely white, making it impossible to discern the semen. I think you can understand that this cannot be used as a "facial compilation". So how about a sample? At least the downloaded video version is useless. A list of every 10 "starring actresses" is presented. There is no indication of the name of the original work. Moreover, in this compilation, the time per actress is quite different, so it takes a lot of time to check the actress's name → search for the actress's location. So, how about it as a "normal compilation"? We have a lineup of high-quality mature female actresses. No matter how harsh the scores are, there isn't a single person who is ugly. However, from the dialogue alone, there are 12 cases that contain incest. There's probably a little more. ...Does anyone think of "incest" when looking at this title, description, packaging, and genre name? Is incest such a major genre that it can be thrown into a compilation that doesn't specify anything, whether it's a stepmother setting or a real mother setting? I think this is an area where there is a strong taboo, and many people feel intimidated by it... When I saw the label name, I thought, "That's it," but this is the first time I've seen an AV where I can only tell the content of the work by the label name. It's not just consumers who can be reached through labels. There are too many lies in the title, description, and package photo. I would like to ask the creators to seriously consider this.

The white fluid sprays forcefully onto the face of the actress as she reaches her peak. Man, this is 60 rounds of the best facial cumshots. A permanent keeper. This one disc is all you need. Squirt and facials—it's like a grand fireworks display of AV.