SDJS-290 - Exposed female advertising model, semi-nude advertising work, sexually objectified female employee, Production Department Shinta Yoshimi

As others have written, there may be a problem with the planning, but I've seen all of this actress's work since her debut, and I think the biggest problem is that she never gets erotic. This actress is always shy. No matter what she does, she's stiff, and there hasn't been a single scene that feels genuine since her debut. She's completely stiff in this work too. Naturally, it's not erotic, and there are no exciting scenes. Honestly, I don't think she's suited to be an AV actress.

Like others have said, the composition is a bit strange. The first half features the actor rubbing his genitals against her lower body, and then wandering around the office, engaging in meaningless conversation with the actor. There's no sense of shame from the start, she just smiles and shoots according to the script. I like the actress, though... hmm.

It seems like Ms. Shinta is consistently unlucky with her projects. This one also keeps getting tangled up in a halfway manner, making it hard to watch, and there's nothing to cut out. The actress is good, so she shouldn't try to be quirky or do unnecessary things, and should just shoot it more simply.

I don't know what the point of this is, but there are several instances of non-erotic bare sex. It takes about an hour from the start to finally see something resembling a sex scene, but the joining part isn't visible at all, so it might be bare sex again. There's another scene that looks like sex in the bathroom sink, but you can't see the joining part either, so you don't know if it's being inserted or not. Then there's a scene that looks like sex in the office, and while it feels like something went in during the insertion scene, you can't see the joining part at all, so you can't be sure if it's real. Finally, a chubby Jeong Song appears, but the joining part isn't visible either. Whether it's simulated or real is unknown because you can't see it.

"Have your lower body stripped bare by the charging actor" No way. Even if it's stripped bare, she's just working in a "half-naked" state... Ugh. Looking at the jacket photo, the question "Is this outfit for a meeting?" comes up along with the second image from the top right of the sample image, but what kind of meeting is it? lol To begin with, the setting is a "female employee working at SOD," right? I've experienced this "inside SOD" many times before, and even now, the "shameful work" feels awkward and doesn't excite me at all. lol Maybe if the setting was "at another company," I might get a little more excited. Look at her expression? Does she look embarrassed and blushing? Does she look like she's holding back tears from shame? She's just smiling and doing it. Where did the shame go? To be honest, uh~.