SDMS-900 - Street Voyeur Live: Panty-Peeking Real-Time Action

*The process was for the actors to take pictures upside down with a shoe turtle or a camera installed on the floor, and generate their own electricity while viewing the footage on a small monitor at hand.　 Bukkake flow from behind depending on the situation Bad points ①It's not a wide screen because it was made over 10 years ago. ②The main character is a shoe turtle, but the image quality is horribly bad and the image of the pants is fatally small. ③For the above reasons, it is difficult to treat him as a faggot. Good points Unusual and interesting points ①General upside-down bird stuff only shows footage of the subject, but this one is interesting because it even captures the role of a voyeur who follows a woman and even takes pictures of her. ②The project setting is erotic and interesting, so it would be a good work if the images were enlarged clearly. ③I like panty shots, but it might also be popular among people who find the act of sneaking up on them from behind to film them. However, voyeurism is not allowed. When I watch this work, I realize that the person who commits such an act is hilarious, and everyone around him knows it's suspicious. Let's leave this kind of thing to the AV and stop it before we get caught copying it and lose everything.

*It wasn't very good. I bought this because I like panty shot voyeurs, but I was left dissatisfied with it. First of all, the image quality is not good. People who want to see panty shots clearly should not buy this product. I get excited by the situation of secretly filming women's skirts in the city! , I like that situation more than panty shots! I think I recommend it to people. Personally, I wanted to see more panty shots, so this was a work that left me dissatisfied.

Tastes vary, but for those who love panty shots, this is irresistible. Sure, it’s clearly staged and the image quality leaves something to be desired. However, if you're the type who can't help but wonder what's under the skirt when you see someone in a provocative mini or a flowy skirt on the street, I recommend it. Candid-style panty shots are rare in this genre, so that alone makes it worth a look.

I can't tell if this is supposed to be a hidden camera concept or a planned production. It feels too staged to be a hidden camera, but it lacks the actual sex scenes you'd expect from a planned production. It's just underwhelming.

I'm not a fan of the low-angle camera shots; whether they were going for realism or not, it's too dark and the quality is so low that it's just unwatchable.