SIVR-256 - [VR] Tsukasa Aoi - The most realistic sex in VR history!! A new 'hame-tori' VR focusing on W-angle (subjective/handheld & objective/fixed camera).

Like the title says, it's got this super raw, unfiltered feel! I thought it was pretty steamy, so I'm surprised it's rated so low. Seriously, what's going on? ＞＜

Men appearing realistically is a no-go. Maybe if you have the ability to erase the male actor from your mind, it's okay. If there's zero trace of the male actor, it's a five-star experience.

Personally, I think this is a masterpiece of all time. I understand there's going to be mixed opinions, and I respect those who prioritize subjective immersion, but ultimately it comes down to whether or not you can get excited watching someone else's sex up close. Seriously, the developers should clearly warn people who can *only* get aroused through their own imagination to not buy this, and stop people from dropping stars with comments like "VR doesn't need men" or "failed experimental attempt" – comments that have nothing to do with the actual evaluation. For example, that's like leaving a comment on a gay video saying "I don't want to see men having sex." Just don't watch it. (The developers just need to try not to show it.) Before VR, everyone got excited watching actresses panting and moaning because of a faceless male actor in 2D videos. Is it wrong to want to see that in 3D? Even if you set the scenario to a boss, a sister, or a SM scene, the content is always the same: just a woman awkwardly shaking her hips on top of a whale-like man (with no story whatsoever!). I think a lot of people are getting tired of that. For those people, I think this work will be a huge breakthrough that brightens the future. I believe there's a future here for VR with real storylines, VR that beautifully depicts a woman being dominated by a man, and VR with women genuinely moaning with pleasure.

I don't know what they were going for, but I just can't get into it. What were they thinking? Who even *is* the director?

While it's good that you can experience both subjective and objective perspectives, the male performer's presence is just overwhelming. He takes up so much screen time, it's almost like *he's* the lead, and he really drives the whole scene. I think it's because they're trying to connect the subjective and objective views with the framing device of being filmed with a camera that his role got so inflated. Honestly, they should have just kept the objective and subjective sections separate – objective for the first half, objective for the second. I'd really like to see more content from the objective viewpoint, so I'm hoping for more variety in the future.