
With 35 years left on the mortgage and her husband's salary shrinking, she decides to take a part-time job to make ends meet. She finds a suspicious ad for a 'Housewife-only Soapland.' Thinking it was just a regular gig, she goes for an interview, only to discover it's a hardcore parlor where housewives are forced into extreme sexual services for perverted clients. Now, she's trapped in a world of shame and pleasure to pay off her debts.




















Ryoko-san has become much more voluptuous over the last year or two. I've seen reviews criticizing her for gaining weight, but is that really a bad thing? Everyone ages, and I think what matters is whether you still have charm and sex appeal as you get older. In that sense, I think Ryoko-san is aging gracefully. A body like hers is just so comfortable to hold. This work relies entirely on Ryoko-san's charm. It's a simple story about a woman becoming a soapland girl because her husband's salary was cut. To make matters worse, there's only one actual sex scene in bed, which is pretty disappointing. Venus sells low-priced AVs, but I wonder if there's a correlation between the 'number of sex scenes' and the 'pay'? If they keep up this 'you get what you pay for' attitude, won't it eventually backfire? Therefore, this rating is solely for Ryoko-san, not for the Venus company.
*Ryoko Murakami's breasts are definitely deflated and drooping. My body is showing signs of decline due to age. Her erotic ball nipples also look like pickled plums. Her face is lackluster and fine lines are noticeable. Murakami has always been good at dirty talk, and I wanted to see this work with Murakami from three years ago.