WND-132 - Wakazuma no Nioi VOL.132

*Normally I wouldn't buy it because of the old-fashioned packaging, title, and low reviews, so I normally wouldn't buy it, but I bought it on sale and it was a big hit. Since people don't understand the production's intentions and it's been poorly rated, I'll write my own interpretation: It's a work that recreates the perspective of a man having sex from a completely subjective angle, so if you watch the video from your own perspective, you can have a simulated experience. What is distinctive about it is the naturalness of the subjective angle. Since the camera is placed in front of the man from beginning to end, there are no unnatural angles such as shooting from the side of the man even though it is subjective, and the world that men in the world watch during sex is realistically reproduced. The reason why the video is dark is to make it difficult for the cameraman's shadow to be seen, and although it can be viewed without any problems on today's LCDs, which are more advanced than those at the time of release, if you are concerned about this, you may find it easier to view the video if you darken your room, as the video will be brighter. The image becomes clearer and easier to see when the room is darkened, which suggests that the set consisted of just the futon so as not to distract people from anything other than the actress. The lighting and sets are well thought out to recreate the obvious fact that during sex, the man only sees the woman's expression and body. The relationship itself is normal, but the actress is more beautiful than the package and has the best body, and during insertion, there are many breast fondling scenes that make use of her beautiful big breasts to satisfy the man's lewd mind, and it is erotic that you can hear the sound of the love juice sloshing with the piston with her modest pant. A lot of time is spent on the blowjob and penetration scenes, so the relationship is just like real sex, where the man has to satisfy his desire while holding back his ejaculation. If I had to complain, it would be that the cunnilingus scene was short. The viewpoint of cunnilingus, which is difficult to obtain from a subjective angle, is recreated with a small idea, and the perspective unique to cunnilingus, in which the viewer licks the clitoris and fondles the breasts while watching the other person's reaction, is realistic and erotic, and it is a shame that the cunnilingus scene is so short, as it is highly reproducible. However, in the scene where the woman is fondling her breasts while cunnilingus, I noticed the attention to detail in the subjective angle, which recreates the perspective of a man looking from between the woman's crotches, and I was convinced that I had found an unexpected treasure in this work.

I don't understand the production team's intent. Did they film it in the dark on purpose just to save on lighting costs? The footage is extremely dark, and is the constant use of only a bed set another way to save on production costs? I wonder how the company stays in business selling such cheap, cost-cutting content.

I didn't realize you were in something like this, Marina-san. To be honest, I haven't watched it... it's one of those works you know exactly what to expect from before even clicking. It feels like a worse version of 'Tokyo 25 Hours'; while there might be more action and denser content, the whole vibe is just gloomy. There's been talk about retirement, but is she really going to end up doing these B-grade series? It's a shame.

It's a work themed around a steamy night, and it's very erotic. As is the case with most works from this studio, the screen is a bit dark and hard to see, but other than that, there are no real issues.