SSNI-954 - Hand-raised daughter turns out not to be mine, so I claimed her as my own - Miharu Usaki

Is this based on an existing work? The characters and setting are quite well-defined. I thought it was pretty good.

This theme always flows within the context of the destruction and rebirth of a family. Incidentally, in a normal movie, the father would inevitably be the villain. Of course, that happens, but it's not everything. Is the conventional narrative really justice? The daughter might end up in a facility under the 'Difficult Women Support Act'—a poverty business scheme for embezzling public funds—where she's drugged and can never escape, or perhaps in foster care. The media, politicians, and scholars are all on the side of the poverty business. Next, the father is the first man, and there is naturally a primal urge to steal the father away from the mother. The story is wild, but the psychological insight is truly excellent. The baby play is also a story of 're-living' one's life. Well, the actor playing the father often plays villains, but he does comedic roles too. In fact, because he usually plays villains, his final line hits harder. I assume the mother is an AV actress and the partner is an AV actor (a released convict in the story). Some might say there is no salvation for Miharu, but she still has her school, her home, her father's workplace, and her family. At least her daily life remains. She fears losing that normalcy. If you know works like 'Bonjour Tristesse,' you'll realize this story is quite intricately crafted. Are we really just going to dismiss this as mere erotic manga and AV?

*I like the flesh and the face! Miss “Miharu”! Even after 5 years since his debut, he still looks great in the main shooting mode!

Both the actress and the actor gave flawless performances. I was looking forward to the baby play, but it turned out Miharu-san was the one acting like the baby. Still, it was good.

*It's a live-action adaptation of the original manga, and I haven't read the original, so there may be some things that are off the mark... There are some errors in the content introduction. At least my father does not think of his registered daughter (hereinafter omitted) as an object of sexual desire. The father only fucked his daughter once, in a fit of passion immediately after the parent-child relationship was denied. Moreover, he is about to turn himself in to the police right after that. (Though my daughter stops me.) The daughter is looking for sex and play later. Some people may say that the actor is a skinhead and looks like a villain, but He skillfully portrays emotional movements through changes in facial expressions and vocalizations. Daughter is father and son throughout the story. I can tell that they really put a lot of effort into raising them. That's why I was so shocked when I found out that it was a stubble egg. And even if she is betrayed and raped, the daughter wants to be by her father's side. The two develop a strange relationship, neither parent and child nor lovers. At the end, the daughter's biological father (who had just been released from prison) comes out. I found out that I was getting back together with my mother. The situation suddenly takes a turn, and the father and daughter trap the mother and husband and get evidence of their affair. Divorced and kicked my mother out of the house. My father didn't ask for compensation because he was the one who gave birth to me. (Probably there will be no property division in exchange for no claim.In reality, even if it is a small amount, there will be no alimony.) It seems better to record which one is worse in the public record.) What catches the eye is the diaper play. It comes out like a child's play, but This is a play that sometimes appears in erotic novels. It's part of toddler play, and people urinate in public while wearing them. It's rare in AV, perhaps because it's hard to visually confirm. I think it's a good play that could have had more.